The claimant who withdraws preliminary relief proceedings has to pay the defendant’s legal costs

Up to the present time, uncertainty remained in the Dutch IP-world about who has to reimburse the (full) legal costs if preliminary relief proceedings are withdrawn before the court session commences. I have conducted legal proceedings on this matter and have previously published about this subject. The Dutch Supreme Court has recently brought an end to this uncertainty: if the (former) claimant withdraws the case, he shall be burdened with the actual costs the (former) defendant has incurred.

Read More
Chambers and Legal 500 rankings 2016

In April the most important rankings for lawyers and law firms were published: Chambers and Legal 500. Chambers and Legal 500 research the legal market in detail and gauge the opinions of clients and colleagues. Only the best lawyers and firms are listed. Just like in previous years Hoogenraad & Haak and our lawyers do very well in the rankings. Many thanks to our clients and colleagues for providing us with great feedback!

Read More
Birds and the bees: buthylhydroxi…blergh!

Let me tell you about the birds and the bees…Zonnatura is a manufacturer of healthy (biological) products. The company is convinced that it is unnecessary to use a lot of additives to make tasty and healthy food. They show this opinion in a commercial with a singing bee flying through nature, ending up in a factory.

Read More
Advertising, FoodDaniel Haije
Dispute with the coughing consumer: Bronchostop

At the beginning of the year, almost everything is about tissues, vitamin supplements, thermometers and snivelling colleagues. In the middle of the flu 2016 epidemic, Boehringer, the producer of the well-known cough syrup Bisolvon, sued its competitor Omega Pharma, a newcomer to the cough market. It was alleged that Omega Pharma had produced misleading advertising for its new cough product BRONCHOSTOP®.

Read More
AdvertisingDaniel Haije
Filling Pieces / De Schoenenfabriek: concerning the transfer of IP rights

Shoe designer Guillaume Philibert has designed and sold shoes (called Low Tops) for quite some time. See for example the Low Top Python on the left. At first he started his business as an independent trader and from 2014 in the form of a Limited Liability Company (Filling Pieces BV). In 2015, a competing shoe store, De Schoenenfabriek, launched de Sneaker Snake, pictured to the right. Both models look remarkably similar to one another. A clear infringement of copyright and model rights, one would think.

Read More
Claim for therapy: no evidence based medicine required

“The Krullaards Perfect Body Reset therapy puts you right again. The tilt of the hips with respect to the spinal column is removed with the plate.” This was the promise of Krullaards on their website. Therapy in which a patient stands in various positions on a vibrating plate in order to assist in the tilt of the hips and thus remove the difference in the length of the legs.

Read More
AdvertisingDaniel Haije
Patents: interactive image screens

In a dispute concerning two patents with respect to interactive television screens, the question arose whether the patented inventions of Smart Technologies UCL had lead to valid patent rights and whether CTouch Europe BV had infringed those rights. CTouch claimed that Smart Technologies had not clearly substantiated its infringement claims.

Read More
Afraid, More afraid, Most afraid

Small kids are afraid of the dark, and also very afraid of the scary clown on the bus-shelter poster for the annual Halloween party in fun park Walibi. The bus-shelter was located within 170m of a day-care centre and pre-school play centre. Too close, according to the Advertising Code Committee (ACC). Obviously, the question of whether the advertisement is contrary to good taste and decency is subjective. However, in the case of advertisements in public spaces, one cannot avoid them, and thus this is judged a bit more strictly.

Read More
AdvertisingDaniel Haije
After 17 years of procedures: an end to the stripe-conflict

After a conflict of more than 17 years, adidas finally won at the Court of Appeal Arnhem-Leeuwarden. In the meantime, the case landed on the desks of many different courts (the Court of Justice of the EU, the Supreme Court). In this case the question arose whether the 3-striped pattern could be seen as a trade mark. The CJEU held that this was the case. It is interesting to note that this case once started as summary proceedings. The Court of Appeal held that even after 17 years, adidas’ claims were still “sufficiently urgent”, since H&M still denied the infringement

Read More
Country report: Health claims for botanicals: ‘on hold’, yet forbidden?

In our last country report (EFFL 06/2015), we stressed that the Dutch Advertising Code Committee (ACC) is a force to reckon with in Dutch food law. Apart from applying rules on misleading and comparative advertising, the ACC also applies specific statutory food regulations, such as provisions on food information (FIC Regulation) and on nutrition and health claims (Claims Regulation).

Read More
Food, AdvertisingDaniel Haije